In this post a flat architecture based Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), and cluster architecture based Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP) are evaluated and compared in terms of packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load, average end to end delay, channel utilization and control overhead in terms of packets and bytes by varying number of nodes per sq. km, traffic sources, mobility, speed and network load. It is shown through results that CBRP is a better routing protocol in the presence of large number of nodes, increased network traffic and load.
for detail pdf and ppt of evaluation of cluster based routing protocol in ad hoc networks
↧
Performance evaluation of cluster based routing protocol in ad hoc networks
↧
